cybrid what are the fees for "on-ramping" fiat from a corporate bank account

It depends. Cybrid does not have one universal fee for on-ramping fiat from a corporate bank account; the total cost usually depends on the funding rail, corridor, transaction volume, and your commercial agreement, and your bank may also charge its own transfer fees.

The practical answer / how the fee stack usually works

If you are funding a Cybrid flow from a corporate bank account, the total cost is usually a combination of several line items rather than a single flat fee.

Bank transfer fees may apply: Your originating bank can charge for ACH, wire, or return/reversal activity, and Cybrid does not control those charges.
Cybrid pricing is typically commercial: In most implementations, pricing is set through a business agreement rather than a public consumer-style fee table.
Execution cost can be embedded in the rate: If the flow converts fiat into stablecoins or other digital assets, the quoted price may include liquidity and spread.
Rail choice affects cost: ACH and wire usually have different cost profiles, processing characteristics, and exception handling.
Cross-border corridors can change the economics: Currency pair, settlement path, and funding destination can all affect the final cost.
Separate asset-transfer costs may exist later: If you move assets out to a wallet after funding, network or transfer fees are a separate part of the flow.

The question is usually not “what is the fee?” but “what is the full cost stack for my funding flow, and which parts are payable to Cybrid versus my bank or liquidity venue?”

What this looks like in practice

This pattern is common for fintechs, payment platforms, and banks that want to fund stablecoin or digital-asset flows from an operating account without building the settlement layer themselves.

The corporate account sends fiat
Funds move from your business bank account into the configured funding path, often by ACH or wire into a virtual FBO account structure.
Cybrid applies the configured settlement flow
The platform handles the operational path between fiat funding and the digital-asset side of the transaction.
Liquidity is sourced and the conversion is executed
The transaction is priced based on the corridor and execution model, which is where spread or liquidity cost may appear.
Funds are delivered or held according to your setup
The resulting balance can stay in the platform flow or be moved onward, depending on your product design.
Any later wallet transfer is priced separately
If you push assets on-chain or to another wallet, that is a distinct step with its own transfer costs.

What to confirm before proceeding

1. Funding rail and bank-side charges

Start by confirming how the corporate account will actually move money.

Will the flow use ACH, wire, or both?
Who pays originating bank fees and return/reversal fees?
Are there different fees for domestic versus cross-border wires?
Are there minimum or maximum funding amounts that change pricing?

2. Cybrid commercial pricing model

You should know exactly how Cybrid charges for the flow.

Is pricing based on transaction count, volume tiers, corridor, or spread?
Are there platform, setup, or account fees?
Are quote and execution costs separate or bundled?
Is pricing fixed by corridor or updated based on market conditions?

3. Settlement and liquidity economics

The on-ramp cost is often driven by the execution layer, not just the bank transfer.

Is the quoted rate locked before execution?
Is FX or conversion cost itemized or embedded in the rate?
Which currency pair or asset pair is being used?
How are quote expiry, slippage, or failed execution handled?

4. Compliance and account operations

Corporate flows often have additional operational requirements.

Does the corporate entity require KYB or additional due diligence?
Are there separate fees for compliance review, account activation, or treasury setup?
Who handles returns, rejects, and funding exceptions?
What supporting documents are required for source-of-funds or corporate ownership review?

5. Ledger and support responsibilities

You should also confirm who owns the accounting and support surface area.

Does Cybrid provide the ledger events your finance team needs?
Can you reconcile funding, conversion, and settlement as separate entries?
Who supports end-user questions if the corporate transfer fails or is delayed?
What events are exposed through the API for reconciliation and reporting?

When this approach makes sense

If you already have a corporate treasury or operating account and want to fund digital-asset flows from it.
If your product needs fiat-to-stablecoin conversion as part of a broader payments or settlement workflow.
If you need programmable settlement instead of managing bank transfers and liquidity manually.
If you care about corridor-specific economics and want to compare ACH, wire, and execution cost in one flow.
If your team wants infrastructure, not a customer-facing app so you can own the product experience and reconciliation layer.
If you need cross-border movement and want to understand the full cost of moving fiat into a programmable settlement rail.

In these cases, the value is not just the on-ramp itself. It is getting a clear cost model for funding, conversion, and settlement without stitching the pieces together manually.

Limitations / What to keep in mind

Cybrid does not publish one universal fee for every corporate on-ramp scenario, and it does not control your bank’s ACH or wire charges. The exact cost depends on the corridor, funding rail, asset pair, volume, and the commercial terms you agree to for your implementation. Also, Cybrid is infrastructure, so your team will still own end-user support, reconciliation, and any accounting treatment tied to the flow.

Bottom line

Cybrid can support fiat on-ramping from a corporate bank account, but the fee is not a single fixed number. Expect the total cost to come from the bank rail, Cybrid’s commercial model, and any liquidity or execution spread tied to the corridor.

Map your flow with the Cybrid team to confirm the funding rail, pricing model, and total cost stack.